<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Backbone of America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2006/12/06/the-backbone-of-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2006/12/06/the-backbone-of-america/</link>
	<description>notes, photos, and other collectible fragments</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2006/12/06/the-backbone-of-america/#comment-77209</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2006/12/06/the-backbone-of-america/#comment-77209</guid>
		<description>David: sounds about right given that the matrix could be soft rock and the bumps harder, erosion seems like the process. If I only had a GPS active when I took this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David: sounds about right given that the matrix could be soft rock and the bumps harder, erosion seems like the process. If I only had a GPS active when I took this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David N.</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2006/12/06/the-backbone-of-america/#comment-77199</link>
		<dc:creator>David N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2006/12/06/the-backbone-of-america/#comment-77199</guid>
		<description>As far as I can judge from the photo these are layers of harder rock that are at an angle. Some of the layers are softer and have been eroded away. Your backbone clearly is not as hard as the higher escarpements around it, but slightly hard then the other parts of the valley. Glaciers would not leave these kind of traces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I can judge from the photo these are layers of harder rock that are at an angle. Some of the layers are softer and have been eroded away. Your backbone clearly is not as hard as the higher escarpements around it, but slightly hard then the other parts of the valley. Glaciers would not leave these kind of traces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
