<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/06/24/google-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/06/24/google-power/</link>
	<description>notes, photos, and other collectible fragments</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dilip Muralidaran</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/06/24/google-power/#comment-153489</link>
		<dc:creator>Dilip Muralidaran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 02:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/06/24/google-power/#comment-153489</guid>
		<description>Richard,

That sounds very promising. I'm gonna have to try that for myself first hand and see how it suits me. The 50MM F/1.8 II was great but its not reliable. The reason why that lens was messed up was because of a freebie UV Filter that was mounted on it when i got my camera and initial set of lenses etc., 

In the process of removing the jammed UV filter (when i replaced all of my filters with HOYA and Marumi ones) the lens was ripped apart and apparently its not all that in place when put back together. 

I'll probably rent a 85MM for a day or a week and see how it goes and decide what to buy.

Luv,

Dilip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p>That sounds very promising. I&#8217;m gonna have to try that for myself first hand and see how it suits me. The 50MM F/1.8 II was great but its not reliable. The reason why that lens was messed up was because of a freebie UV Filter that was mounted on it when i got my camera and initial set of lenses etc., </p>
<p>In the process of removing the jammed UV filter (when i replaced all of my filters with HOYA and Marumi ones) the lens was ripped apart and apparently its not all that in place when put back together. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll probably rent a 85MM for a day or a week and see how it goes and decide what to buy.</p>
<p>Luv,</p>
<p>Dilip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/06/24/google-power/#comment-153427</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/06/24/google-power/#comment-153427</guid>
		<description>Dilip: The 50mm f/1.4 and 85mm f/1.8 are similar lenses and both are much sturdier than the "thrifty fifty" you have/had. I think the 85 will be better suited to portraits as it will let you get back further and so, catch people a bit more relaxed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dilip: The 50mm f/1.4 and 85mm f/1.8 are similar lenses and both are much sturdier than the &#8220;thrifty fifty&#8221; you have/had. I think the 85 will be better suited to portraits as it will let you get back further and so, catch people a bit more relaxed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manish</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/06/24/google-power/#comment-153359</link>
		<dc:creator>Manish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/06/24/google-power/#comment-153359</guid>
		<description>I'll vouch for the 50mm f/1.4 as a fantastic portrait lens (for the 1.6x non-full-frame cameras at least) - I'd expect it would be more like an 80mm lens on a lower-end DSLR that isn't full-frame, like my XTi.

The 50mm is fast and the f/1.4 variety provides a smooth and attractive bokeh. My favorite for indoor portraits. I have to thank you, Richard, for the introduction to what is still my favorite lens.

I also like the 100mm f/2.8 macro lens for its razor sharpness although focus can be a bit slow, and depth-of-field can get very shallow for both beautiful effects OR unintentional out-of-focus parts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll vouch for the 50mm f/1.4 as a fantastic portrait lens (for the 1.6x non-full-frame cameras at least) - I&#8217;d expect it would be more like an 80mm lens on a lower-end DSLR that isn&#8217;t full-frame, like my XTi.</p>
<p>The 50mm is fast and the f/1.4 variety provides a smooth and attractive bokeh. My favorite for indoor portraits. I have to thank you, Richard, for the introduction to what is still my favorite lens.</p>
<p>I also like the 100mm f/2.8 macro lens for its razor sharpness although focus can be a bit slow, and depth-of-field can get very shallow for both beautiful effects OR unintentional out-of-focus parts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dilip Muralidaran</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/06/24/google-power/#comment-153319</link>
		<dc:creator>Dilip Muralidaran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 17:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/06/24/google-power/#comment-153319</guid>
		<description>Hi Richard,

Thanks for blogging this. It was fun doing this shoot although i regret the lens problems. 

I can't wait to buy the 50MM F/1.4 and start portraits again. The Kit lens does not do any good for portraits. I need to check out what the 85MM F/1.8 costs like in india and decide what i really want before i buy.

I hope the 85MM F/1.8 is not of a plastic build and is better than the 50MM F/1.8 one. I'll visit the canon dealer here and torture him as usual with dumb ass questions of mine.

Luv,

Dilip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard,</p>
<p>Thanks for blogging this. It was fun doing this shoot although i regret the lens problems. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait to buy the 50MM F/1.4 and start portraits again. The Kit lens does not do any good for portraits. I need to check out what the 85MM F/1.8 costs like in india and decide what i really want before i buy.</p>
<p>I hope the 85MM F/1.8 is not of a plastic build and is better than the 50MM F/1.8 one. I&#8217;ll visit the canon dealer here and torture him as usual with dumb ass questions of mine.</p>
<p>Luv,</p>
<p>Dilip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
