<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM and Macro Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/</link>
	<description>notes, photos, and other collectible fragments</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:11:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-192668</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/#comment-192668</guid>
		<description>Gedas: It&#039;s an excellent lens but it has a plastic barrel and can be a bit fragile so handle with care. Very slow AF in anything but macro mode, really made for manual focus macro photography. However, it can be used for portraits and such, just not super fast work.

Let me know what you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gedas: It&#8217;s an excellent lens but it has a plastic barrel and can be a bit fragile so handle with care. Very slow AF in anything but macro mode, really made for manual focus macro photography. However, it can be used for portraits and such, just not super fast work.</p>
<p>Let me know what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gedas Girdvainis</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-192665</link>
		<dc:creator>Gedas Girdvainis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/#comment-192665</guid>
		<description>Hey, i&#039;m ordered this old version today, hope tomorrow or saturday ( on wedding) I can play with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, i&#8217;m ordered this old version today, hope tomorrow or saturday ( on wedding) I can play with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-190990</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 02:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/#comment-190990</guid>
		<description>Jolee: It&#039;s a great lens, every bit as good as the L version of it which has a sturdier barrel and image stabilization.

I eventually sold this lens and got the higher end L version, less for the optics (about the same), more for the IS and lack of fragility.

If you&#039;re careful with the non-L lens you&#039;ll be fine. Thanks for commenting here and enjoy the world of macro photography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jolee: It&#8217;s a great lens, every bit as good as the L version of it which has a sturdier barrel and image stabilization.</p>
<p>I eventually sold this lens and got the higher end L version, less for the optics (about the same), more for the IS and lack of fragility.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re careful with the non-L lens you&#8217;ll be fine. Thanks for commenting here and enjoy the world of macro photography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jolee</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-190989</link>
		<dc:creator>Jolee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 01:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/#comment-190989</guid>
		<description>Thanks Richard. I&#039;m deciding on a macro lens and you just sold me this one! I&#039;m glad you never delete postings too, this was written five years ago and is still so useful. 
Jolee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Richard. I&#8217;m deciding on a macro lens and you just sold me this one! I&#8217;m glad you never delete postings too, this was written five years ago and is still so useful.<br />
Jolee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-180822</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/#comment-180822</guid>
		<description>Sabina, It&#039;s always better to use a dedicated macro lens than a macro closeup ring added to another lens.

I&#039;d avoid the ring flash until you explore macro photography more. I do quite a bit of it but have no ring flash and don&#039;t use flash at all in my macro work. A good tripod and a remote shutter release are the most important pieces of gear you&#039;ll want.

Thanks for the kind words about my images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sabina, It&#8217;s always better to use a dedicated macro lens than a macro closeup ring added to another lens.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d avoid the ring flash until you explore macro photography more. I do quite a bit of it but have no ring flash and don&#8217;t use flash at all in my macro work. A good tripod and a remote shutter release are the most important pieces of gear you&#8217;ll want.</p>
<p>Thanks for the kind words about my images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sabina</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-180816</link>
		<dc:creator>sabina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/#comment-180816</guid>
		<description>hello, 
do you know maybe what would be the difference, if i put raynox 250 lens on my 135mm canon or if i but 100 mm macro canon lens. 
The first option is cheaper, but i wouldn&#039;t mind to but the latter if the performance is much better / sharpness etc. 
Is the magnification greater with one or another?
i am very fresh at this so i appreciate any help/advice you can give me. 
I am also interested in buying a ring flash - which would you suggest for any of these compositions?
thank you so much for reply
btw, great photos!
sabina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello,<br />
do you know maybe what would be the difference, if i put raynox 250 lens on my 135mm canon or if i but 100 mm macro canon lens.<br />
The first option is cheaper, but i wouldn&#8217;t mind to but the latter if the performance is much better / sharpness etc.<br />
Is the magnification greater with one or another?<br />
i am very fresh at this so i appreciate any help/advice you can give me.<br />
I am also interested in buying a ring flash &#8211; which would you suggest for any of these compositions?<br />
thank you so much for reply<br />
btw, great photos!<br />
sabina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-178769</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/#comment-178769</guid>
		<description>Greg: I&#039;m not sure about the compatibility of the Raynox device but I&#039;m quite sure that better quality is gotten out of dedicated macro lenses than it is from adding macro glass/magnifiers to the front of existing lenses.

A better solution as an alternative to a dedicated macro lens would be extension tubes.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/375102-REG/Kenko_AEXTUBEDGC_Auto_Extension_Tube_Set.html/BI/1838/KBID/2478&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kenko&lt;/a&gt; makes a nice set that&#039;s not too pricey and works with all Canon compatible lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg: I&#8217;m not sure about the compatibility of the Raynox device but I&#8217;m quite sure that better quality is gotten out of dedicated macro lenses than it is from adding macro glass/magnifiers to the front of existing lenses.</p>
<p>A better solution as an alternative to a dedicated macro lens would be extension tubes.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/375102-REG/Kenko_AEXTUBEDGC_Auto_Extension_Tube_Set.html/BI/1838/KBID/2478" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Kenko</a> makes a nice set that&#8217;s not too pricey and works with all Canon compatible lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg F.</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-178768</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/#comment-178768</guid>
		<description>Richard thank you for this wealth of info. A store closing and sale
is helping me towards this purchase for a Canon 40d. I have a friend at Flickr that uses a Raynox-250 and was wondering if this could be used on all of Canons lenses. Im new to all of this Digital camera work and now being retired gives me some freedom to enjoy it. Thanks again for your wonderful write up on this lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard thank you for this wealth of info. A store closing and sale<br />
is helping me towards this purchase for a Canon 40d. I have a friend at Flickr that uses a Raynox-250 and was wondering if this could be used on all of Canons lenses. Im new to all of this Digital camera work and now being retired gives me some freedom to enjoy it. Thanks again for your wonderful write up on this lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-176968</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/#comment-176968</guid>
		<description>CK: You can certainly get a polarizer for the 100mm macro and use it for non-macro applications. It is not, however, the 85mm f/1.8 which is an excellent lens too with faster AF and probably the better lens for portraits.

But, you can do portraits and macro with the 100mm macro, you cannot do macro work with the 85mm f/1.8.

Solution: buy both lenses. I&#039;m not kidding. This is what you have an interchangeable lens DSLR for, to be able to put on different lenses for different applications.

I know, it&#039;s easy for me to say but seriously, there is no perfect single lens for every or even these two applications.

If you&#039;re serious about macro work then get the 100mm macro and see how it works out for portraits. This solution at least gives you some options. The 85 simply cannot be used for 1:1 macro work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CK: You can certainly get a polarizer for the 100mm macro and use it for non-macro applications. It is not, however, the 85mm f/1.8 which is an excellent lens too with faster AF and probably the better lens for portraits.</p>
<p>But, you can do portraits and macro with the 100mm macro, you cannot do macro work with the 85mm f/1.8.</p>
<p>Solution: buy both lenses. I&#8217;m not kidding. This is what you have an interchangeable lens DSLR for, to be able to put on different lenses for different applications.</p>
<p>I know, it&#8217;s easy for me to say but seriously, there is no perfect single lens for every or even these two applications.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re serious about macro work then get the 100mm macro and see how it works out for portraits. This solution at least gives you some options. The 85 simply cannot be used for 1:1 macro work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CK</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-176967</link>
		<dc:creator>CK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 05:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/07/22/canon-ef-100mm-f28-macro-usm-and-macro-photography/#comment-176967</guid>
		<description>Hi Richard,i&#039;m eyeing this lens but in a dilemma between this and the 85mm/f1.8 cause i want to do both portrait and macro.

for landscape shoot using the 100mm macro,can i get a polariser for it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard,i&#8217;m eyeing this lens but in a dilemma between this and the 85mm/f1.8 cause i want to do both portrait and macro.</p>
<p>for landscape shoot using the 100mm macro,can i get a polariser for it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

