<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s on First? Typography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/12/11/abbott-and-costellos-whos-on-first-in-typography-only/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/12/11/abbott-and-costellos-whos-on-first-in-typography-only/</link>
	<description>notes, photos, and other collectible fragments</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: johno</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/12/11/abbott-and-costellos-whos-on-first-in-typography-only/#comment-171937</link>
		<dc:creator>johno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/12/11/abbott-and-costellos-whos-on-first-in-typography-only/#comment-171937</guid>
		<description>Yes, they are a distraction. I don't know the name of the blue type, but the black is Birch (I think), and Birch does have a real apostrophe.

Anyway, nice video. Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, they are a distraction. I don&#8217;t know the name of the blue type, but the black is Birch (I think), and Birch does have a real apostrophe.</p>
<p>Anyway, nice video. Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/12/11/abbott-and-costellos-whos-on-first-in-typography-only/#comment-171844</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/12/11/abbott-and-costellos-whos-on-first-in-typography-only/#comment-171844</guid>
		<description>John: You know more about type than I do but it seems like they used type to emphasize period, the dialog is 1930-1940s so maybe used type to underscore that. Just a guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John: You know more about type than I do but it seems like they used type to emphasize period, the dialog is 1930-1940s so maybe used type to underscore that. Just a guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John D. Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/12/11/abbott-and-costellos-whos-on-first-in-typography-only/#comment-171835</link>
		<dc:creator>John D. Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2007/12/11/abbott-and-costellos-whos-on-first-in-typography-only/#comment-171835</guid>
		<description>Nicely done, though the straight typewriter apostrophes are distracting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely done, though the straight typewriter apostrophes are distracting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
