<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s alive!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/06/18/its-alive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/06/18/its-alive/</link>
	<description>notes, photos, and other collectible fragments</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:40:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/06/18/its-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-175455</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 04:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/06/18/its-alive/#comment-175455</guid>
		<description>Diane: So, break out that camera and start shooting. Flowers are great fun. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diane: So, break out that camera and start shooting. Flowers are great fun. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/06/18/its-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-175454</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 04:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/06/18/its-alive/#comment-175454</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not weird...it&#039;s really beautiful; I love looking closely at flowers/plants in my garden (and elsewhere). Of course, I&#039;m a gardener. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not weird&#8230;it&#8217;s really beautiful; I love looking closely at flowers/plants in my garden (and elsewhere). Of course, I&#8217;m a gardener. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/06/18/its-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-175404</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/06/18/its-alive/#comment-175404</guid>
		<description>Gedas: No, the 180mm macro isn&#039;t better per se, but because of its focal length it allows one to get further away from the subject and still get 1:1 magnification.

Also, because of the extra focal length you can get a bit more blur at the same aperture. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-180mm-f-3.5-L-USM-Macro-Lens-Review.aspx&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This page&lt;/a&gt; at The Digital Picture has example shots part way down that show this. Check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gedas: No, the 180mm macro isn&#8217;t better per se, but because of its focal length it allows one to get further away from the subject and still get 1:1 magnification.</p>
<p>Also, because of the extra focal length you can get a bit more blur at the same aperture. <a href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-180mm-f-3.5-L-USM-Macro-Lens-Review.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">This page</a> at The Digital Picture has example shots part way down that show this. Check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gedas</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/06/18/its-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-175396</link>
		<dc:creator>Gedas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/06/18/its-alive/#comment-175396</guid>
		<description>absolutely right! hmmmm 180mm is better then 100mm ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>absolutely right! hmmmm 180mm is better then 100mm ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

