<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camera Comparison &#8211; Canon Powershot G9 vs Canon 5D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/06/22/camera-comparison-canon-powershot-g9-vs-canon-5d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/06/22/camera-comparison-canon-powershot-g9-vs-canon-5d/</link>
	<description>notes, photos, and other collectible fragments</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:11:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/06/22/camera-comparison-canon-powershot-g9-vs-canon-5d/comment-page-1/#comment-175522</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/?p=3851#comment-175522</guid>
		<description>Gary, I&#039;m so stuck on RAW if for nothing else, just to correct white balance, that I&#039;d want a clean RAW file to work with. I think we&#039;re better off with the XT or a newer version of it plus a cheap 50mm lens. That will be a small killer combo. I hope to get something like that at some point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary, I&#8217;m so stuck on RAW if for nothing else, just to correct white balance, that I&#8217;d want a clean RAW file to work with. I think we&#8217;re better off with the XT or a newer version of it plus a cheap 50mm lens. That will be a small killer combo. I hope to get something like that at some point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/06/22/camera-comparison-canon-powershot-g9-vs-canon-5d/comment-page-1/#comment-175520</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/?p=3851#comment-175520</guid>
		<description>Richard:  That&#039;s my thinking too.  I had the G9 for a week, and was very bothered by the noise at ISO 400 &amp; above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard:  That&#8217;s my thinking too.  I had the G9 for a week, and was very bothered by the noise at ISO 400 &amp; above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/06/22/camera-comparison-canon-powershot-g9-vs-canon-5d/comment-page-1/#comment-175516</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/?p=3851#comment-175516</guid>
		<description>Jon: Part of me would like to pull the trigger on this camera but part of me just thinks the XT and a cheap 50mm would be better. Bigger but certainly better quality images and it could use all of our good lenses.

Sigh, when in doubt, best to do nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon: Part of me would like to pull the trigger on this camera but part of me just thinks the XT and a cheap 50mm would be better. Bigger but certainly better quality images and it could use all of our good lenses.</p>
<p>Sigh, when in doubt, best to do nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/06/22/camera-comparison-canon-powershot-g9-vs-canon-5d/comment-page-1/#comment-175515</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/?p=3851#comment-175515</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this Richard - a very good read. Spookily, the chap who wrote the article, Mike Solomon, is a guy I was in touch with a few months ago about some wordpress stuff! A small world :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this Richard &#8211; a very good read. Spookily, the chap who wrote the article, Mike Solomon, is a guy I was in touch with a few months ago about some wordpress stuff! A small world :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

