<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Build quality of lenses and repair rates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/12/02/build-quality-of-lenses-and-repair-rates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/12/02/build-quality-of-lenses-and-repair-rates/</link>
	<description>notes, photos, and other collectible fragments</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: edward</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/12/02/build-quality-of-lenses-and-repair-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-177846</link>
		<dc:creator>edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/?p=4814#comment-177846</guid>
		<description>right, well my comment was about lends and build quality in general but yes I agree with you (which is why i always ask you before I buy a lens)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>right, well my comment was about lends and build quality in general but yes I agree with you (which is why i always ask you before I buy a lens)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/12/02/build-quality-of-lenses-and-repair-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-177836</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/?p=4814#comment-177836</guid>
		<description>Edward, all of this is true, but, it&#039;s always good to know which are the decent lenses that may not be top of the line, and among the top of the line L lenses, which ones are less than great. Just because it&#039;s an L doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s any good. Or, better put, just because it&#039;s an L doesn&#039;t mean that all who use it like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edward, all of this is true, but, it&#8217;s always good to know which are the decent lenses that may not be top of the line, and among the top of the line L lenses, which ones are less than great. Just because it&#8217;s an L doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s any good. Or, better put, just because it&#8217;s an L doesn&#8217;t mean that all who use it like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edward</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2008/12/02/build-quality-of-lenses-and-repair-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-177835</link>
		<dc:creator>edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/?p=4814#comment-177835</guid>
		<description>well I think i would always say buy the best you can afford not always but there is a reason why it cost more, granted these days people want everything on the cheap but they don&#039;t realize that it is driving companies (that are there to make a profit) to build things with less quality to get more market share, in order to keep there profit margin up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well I think i would always say buy the best you can afford not always but there is a reason why it cost more, granted these days people want everything on the cheap but they don&#8217;t realize that it is driving companies (that are there to make a profit) to build things with less quality to get more market share, in order to keep there profit margin up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
