<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JPG Magazine goes under, thoughts on user driven content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2009/01/02/jpg-magazine-goes-under-thoughts-on-user-driven-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2009/01/02/jpg-magazine-goes-under-thoughts-on-user-driven-content/</link>
	<description>notes, photos, and other collectible fragments</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:11:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2009/01/02/jpg-magazine-goes-under-thoughts-on-user-driven-content/comment-page-1/#comment-178267</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/?p=4959#comment-178267</guid>
		<description>Cybergus: But, that thread hasn&#039;t been updated in 17 months so it doesn&#039;t acknowledge this new piece of news. I saw that thread a while back and felt the energy there was all wrong: yet another flickr lynch mob out to get whoever the group decided was the bad guy of the moment.

So, the &quot;good riddance&quot; sentiment in that thread would no doubt be even stronger now that 8020 is going under but those people miss the bigger point (at least to me) which is that their very energy and demeanor may have been what sunk JPG and might be in the process of sinking flickr.

I don&#039;t know, but I&#039;m interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cybergus: But, that thread hasn&#8217;t been updated in 17 months so it doesn&#8217;t acknowledge this new piece of news. I saw that thread a while back and felt the energy there was all wrong: yet another flickr lynch mob out to get whoever the group decided was the bad guy of the moment.</p>
<p>So, the &#8220;good riddance&#8221; sentiment in that thread would no doubt be even stronger now that 8020 is going under but those people miss the bigger point (at least to me) which is that their very energy and demeanor may have been what sunk JPG and might be in the process of sinking flickr.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, but I&#8217;m interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyberGus</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2009/01/02/jpg-magazine-goes-under-thoughts-on-user-driven-content/comment-page-1/#comment-178265</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberGus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 08:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/?p=4959#comment-178265</guid>
		<description>Hello Richard

You can take a look to this discussion:

http://www.flickr.com/groups/jpgmag/discuss/72157600216573353/

I deleted my own account long time ago when that happens... and since that date... many people did the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Richard</p>
<p>You can take a look to this discussion:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/jpgmag/discuss/72157600216573353/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/groups/jpgmag/discuss/72157600216573353/</a></p>
<p>I deleted my own account long time ago when that happens&#8230; and since that date&#8230; many people did the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2009/01/02/jpg-magazine-goes-under-thoughts-on-user-driven-content/comment-page-1/#comment-178255</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 14:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardsnotes.org/?p=4959#comment-178255</guid>
		<description>More on this from The New York Times: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/01/8020-media-to-shut-down/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;8020 Media to Shut Down&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More on this from The New York Times: <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/01/8020-media-to-shut-down/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">8020 Media to Shut Down</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

